However, it is vital that with all this, we still should not forget about our negative impact on the environment and about the fact that by simply living in modern society, we contribute to the destruction of the planet, which is why the carbon handprint should always be measured alongside the carbon footprint. With this in mind, it is essential to periodically measure both the foot- and the handprint to get the full picture and to find solutions in which we contribute more to our carbon handprint then to our footprint. For example, if you make the sustainable lifestyle change of cycling to work every day instead of driving, your carbon handprint will be significantly increased. But cycling will still contribute to your carbon footprint as well, as the creation of a bicycle requires materials, energy and resources. This negative impact, however, is clearly overrun by the positive impact of the change, as you would not be making any carbon emissions in your journey to work. Every sustainable lifestyle change that you make should be looked at through this lens: what are the positive and negative impacts of my choice, and which one of these impacts is larger? If the impacts are equal in size, your action can be labelled as carbon neutral, while if the positive outweighs the negative, you can think of it as carbon positive.1 The most important thing is trying to reduce the number of carbon negative choices that you make, but we all know that this is unavoidable in some cases. However, if you continue to be aware of when you make a carbon negative choice, you can also try reducing your carbon footprint as much as possible, even when the choice you make requires the footprint to be greater than the handprint.